Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Emerging and Franklin Templeton Smacs, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Franklin Templeton. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton

0.23

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Franklin Templeton

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between GOLDMAN and Franklin is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Emerging and Franklin Templeton Smacs in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Franklin Templeton Smacs and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Emerging are associated (or correlated) with Franklin Templeton. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Franklin Templeton Smacs has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Emerging is expected to generate 2.67 times more return on investment than Franklin Templeton. However, Goldman Sachs is 2.67 times more volatile than Franklin Templeton Smacs. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Franklin Templeton Smacs is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  723.00  in Goldman Sachs Emerging on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  153.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Emerging or generate 21.16% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Emerging  vs.  Franklin Templeton Smacs

Goldman Sachs Emerging

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Emerging has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Franklin Templeton Smacs

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Templeton Smacs are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical indicators, Franklin Templeton is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Franklin Templeton positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Franklin Templeton can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Franklin Templeton will offset losses from the drop in Franklin Templeton's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Emerging and Franklin Templeton Smacs pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.