Correlation Between Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Marblegate Acquisition Corp and Spring Valley Acquisition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Marblegate Acquisition with a short position of Spring Valley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley.

Diversification Opportunities for Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley

0.43

Correlation Coefficient

Marblegate Acquisition  Spring Valley

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Marblegate and Spring is 0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Marblegate Acquisition Corp and Spring Valley Acquisition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spring Valley Acquisition and Marblegate Acquisition is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Marblegate Acquisition Corp are associated (or correlated) with Spring Valley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spring Valley Acquisition has no effect on the direction of Marblegate Acquisition i.e., Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Marblegate Acquisition is expected to generate 2.11 times less return on investment than Spring Valley. In addition to that, Marblegate Acquisition is 3.33 times more volatile than Spring Valley Acquisition. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Spring Valley Acquisition is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,124  in Spring Valley Acquisition on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  11.00  from holding Spring Valley Acquisition or generate 0.98% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Marblegate Acquisition Corp  vs.  Spring Valley Acquisition

Marblegate Acquisition

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Marblegate Acquisition Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, Marblegate Acquisition is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Spring Valley Acquisition

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Spring Valley Acquisition are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable forward indicators, Spring Valley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Pair Trading with Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Marblegate Acquisition and Spring Valley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Marblegate Acquisition position performs unexpectedly, Spring Valley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spring Valley will offset losses from the drop in Spring Valley's long position.

The idea behind Marblegate Acquisition Corp and Spring Valley Acquisition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.