Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Short and Wells Fargo Mon, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Wells Fargo. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo

-0.26
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GOLDMAN and Wells is -0.26. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Short and Wells Fargo Mon in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Wells Fargo Mon and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Short are associated (or correlated) with Wells Fargo. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Wells Fargo Mon has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 42.33 times less return on investment than Wells Fargo. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Short is 8.47 times less risky than Wells Fargo. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Wells Fargo Mon is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,048  in Wells Fargo Mon on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  185.00  from holding Wells Fargo Mon or generate 9.03% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Short  vs.  Wells Fargo Mon

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Short 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Short are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Wells Fargo Mon 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Wells Fargo Mon are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Wells Fargo may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Wells Fargo can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Wells Fargo will offset losses from the drop in Wells Fargo's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Short and Wells Fargo Mon pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences