Correlation Between Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Floating Rate and Shelton Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Floating with a short position of Shelton Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging

-0.24
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Shelton is -0.24. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Floating Rate and Shelton Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Shelton Emerging Markets and Guggenheim Floating is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Floating Rate are associated (or correlated) with Shelton Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Shelton Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Floating i.e., Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guggenheim Floating Rate is expected to generate 0.11 times more return on investment than Shelton Emerging. However, Guggenheim Floating Rate is 8.93 times less risky than Shelton Emerging. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Shelton Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,393  in Guggenheim Floating Rate on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  37.00  from holding Guggenheim Floating Rate or generate 1.55% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guggenheim Floating Rate  vs.  Shelton Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guggenheim Floating Rate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guggenheim Floating Rate are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Guggenheim Floating is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Shelton Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Over the last 90 days Shelton Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Shelton Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Floating and Shelton Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Floating position performs unexpectedly, Shelton Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Shelton Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Shelton Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Guggenheim Floating Rate and Shelton Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance