Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Absolute and Jpmorgan Dynamic Small, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Jpmorgan Dynamic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic

0.64

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Jpmorgan Dynamic

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Jpmorgan is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Absolute and Jpmorgan Dynamic Small in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Jpmorgan Dynamic Small and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Absolute are associated (or correlated) with Jpmorgan Dynamic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Jpmorgan Dynamic Small has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Absolute is expected to generate 0.32 times more return on investment than Jpmorgan Dynamic. However, Goldman Sachs Absolute is 3.13 times less risky than Jpmorgan Dynamic. It trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Jpmorgan Dynamic Small is currently generating about -0.35 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,024  in Goldman Sachs Absolute on October 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (11.00) from holding Goldman Sachs Absolute or give up 1.07% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Absolute  vs.  Jpmorgan Dynamic Small

Goldman Sachs Absolute

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Absolute has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Jpmorgan Dynamic Small

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Jpmorgan Dynamic Small are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Jpmorgan Dynamic is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan Dynamic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Jpmorgan Dynamic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Jpmorgan Dynamic will offset losses from the drop in Jpmorgan Dynamic's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Absolute and Jpmorgan Dynamic Small pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.