Correlation Between Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Grand Canyon Education and Bannerman Resources Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Grand Canyon with a short position of Bannerman Resources. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources.

Diversification Opportunities for Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources

-0.75
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Grand and Bannerman is -0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Grand Canyon Education and Bannerman Resources Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bannerman Resources and Grand Canyon is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Grand Canyon Education are associated (or correlated) with Bannerman Resources. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bannerman Resources has no effect on the direction of Grand Canyon i.e., Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Grand Canyon Education is expected to generate 0.78 times more return on investment than Bannerman Resources. However, Grand Canyon Education is 1.29 times less risky than Bannerman Resources. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bannerman Resources Limited is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  12,800  in Grand Canyon Education on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,700  from holding Grand Canyon Education or generate 21.09% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Grand Canyon Education  vs.  Bannerman Resources Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Grand Canyon Education 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Grand Canyon Education are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Grand Canyon unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Bannerman Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bannerman Resources Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Bannerman Resources is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources

The main advantage of trading using opposite Grand Canyon and Bannerman Resources positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Grand Canyon position performs unexpectedly, Bannerman Resources can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bannerman Resources will offset losses from the drop in Bannerman Resources' long position.
The idea behind Grand Canyon Education and Bannerman Resources Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes