Correlation Between GM and Booking Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Booking Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Booking Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Booking Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Booking Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Booking Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Booking Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Booking Holdings

0.63
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Booking is 0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Booking Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Booking Holdings and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Booking Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Booking Holdings has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Booking Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Booking Holdings

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 3.21 times less return on investment than Booking Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 3.29 times less risky than Booking Holdings. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Booking Holdings is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  200,760  in Booking Holdings on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  306,740  from holding Booking Holdings or generate 152.79% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy98.59%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Booking Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Booking Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Booking Holdings are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Booking Holdings unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Booking Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Booking Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Booking Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Booking Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Booking Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Booking Holdings' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Booking Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories