Correlation Between GM and Healthequity

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Healthequity at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Healthequity into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Healthequity, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Healthequity and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Healthequity. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Healthequity.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Healthequity

0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Healthequity is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Healthequity in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Healthequity and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Healthequity. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Healthequity has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Healthequity go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Healthequity

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 2.67 times less return on investment than Healthequity. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 1.02 times less risky than Healthequity. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Healthequity is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  7,100  in Healthequity on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,950  from holding Healthequity or generate 27.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy98.48%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Healthequity

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Healthequity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Healthequity are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Healthequity reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Healthequity Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Healthequity

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Healthequity positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Healthequity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Healthequity will offset losses from the drop in Healthequity's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Healthequity pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes