Correlation Between GM and Andrew Peller

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Andrew Peller at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Andrew Peller into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Andrew Peller Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Andrew Peller and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Andrew Peller. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Andrew Peller.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Andrew Peller

-0.19
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Andrew is -0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Andrew Peller Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Andrew Peller Limited and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Andrew Peller. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Andrew Peller Limited has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Andrew Peller go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Andrew Peller

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the Andrew Peller. In addition to that, GM is 2.22 times more volatile than Andrew Peller Limited. It trades about -0.19 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Andrew Peller Limited is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  404.00  in Andrew Peller Limited on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.00) from holding Andrew Peller Limited or give up 0.74% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Andrew Peller Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, GM is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Andrew Peller Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Andrew Peller Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Andrew Peller is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

GM and Andrew Peller Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Andrew Peller

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Andrew Peller positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Andrew Peller can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Andrew Peller will offset losses from the drop in Andrew Peller's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Andrew Peller Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios