Correlation Between GM and Bonesupport Holding

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Bonesupport Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Bonesupport Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Bonesupport Holding AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Bonesupport Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Bonesupport Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Bonesupport Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Bonesupport Holding

0.58
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Bonesupport is 0.58. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Bonesupport Holding AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bonesupport Holding and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Bonesupport Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bonesupport Holding has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Bonesupport Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Bonesupport Holding

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.94 times more return on investment than Bonesupport Holding. However, General Motors is 1.06 times less risky than Bonesupport Holding. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bonesupport Holding AB is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,793  in General Motors on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  388.00  from holding General Motors or generate 8.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy98.46%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Bonesupport Holding AB

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Bonesupport Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bonesupport Holding AB are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Bonesupport Holding is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

GM and Bonesupport Holding Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Bonesupport Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Bonesupport Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Bonesupport Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bonesupport Holding will offset losses from the drop in Bonesupport Holding's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Bonesupport Holding AB pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum