Correlation Between GM and China Oilfield

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and China Oilfield at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and China Oilfield into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and China Oilfield Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and China Oilfield and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of China Oilfield. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and China Oilfield.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and China Oilfield

-0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and China is -0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and China Oilfield Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Oilfield Services and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with China Oilfield. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Oilfield Services has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and China Oilfield go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and China Oilfield

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.58 times more return on investment than China Oilfield. However, General Motors is 1.72 times less risky than China Oilfield. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Oilfield Services is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,284  in General Motors on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,145  from holding General Motors or generate 65.32% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.81%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  China Oilfield Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
China Oilfield Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days China Oilfield Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, China Oilfield is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

GM and China Oilfield Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and China Oilfield

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and China Oilfield positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, China Oilfield can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Oilfield will offset losses from the drop in China Oilfield's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and China Oilfield Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk