Correlation Between GM and Everest Consolidator

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Everest Consolidator at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Everest Consolidator into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Everest Consolidator Acquisition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Everest Consolidator and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Everest Consolidator. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Everest Consolidator.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Everest Consolidator

0.21

Correlation Coefficient

GM  Everest Consolidator

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Everest is 0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Everest Consolidator Acquisiti in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Everest Consolidator and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Everest Consolidator. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Everest Consolidator has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Everest Consolidator go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Everest Consolidator

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 1.17 times more return on investment than Everest Consolidator. However, GM is 1.17 times more volatile than Everest Consolidator Acquisition. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Everest Consolidator Acquisition is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,741  in General Motors on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  512.00  from holding General Motors or generate 10.8% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	98.46%
Values	Daily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Everest Consolidator Acquisiti

General Motors

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Everest Consolidator

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Everest Consolidator Acquisition has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Everest Consolidator is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with GM and Everest Consolidator

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Everest Consolidator positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Everest Consolidator can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Everest Consolidator will offset losses from the drop in Everest Consolidator's long position.

The idea behind General Motors and Everest Consolidator Acquisition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.