Correlation Between GM and Oxford Square

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Oxford Square at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Oxford Square into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Oxford Square Capital, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Oxford Square and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Oxford Square. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Oxford Square.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Oxford Square

0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Oxford is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Oxford Square Capital in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oxford Square Capital and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Oxford Square. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oxford Square Capital has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Oxford Square go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Oxford Square

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the Oxford Square. In addition to that, GM is 6.25 times more volatile than Oxford Square Capital. It trades about -0.16 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Oxford Square Capital is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,321  in Oxford Square Capital on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (4.00) from holding Oxford Square Capital or give up 0.17% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Oxford Square Capital

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Oxford Square Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Oxford Square Capital are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Oxford Square is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

GM and Oxford Square Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Oxford Square

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Oxford Square positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Oxford Square can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oxford Square will offset losses from the drop in Oxford Square's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Oxford Square Capital pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites