Correlation Between GM and Balanced Strategy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Balanced Strategy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Balanced Strategy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Balanced Strategy Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Balanced Strategy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Balanced Strategy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Balanced Strategy.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Balanced Strategy

0.13
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Balanced is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Balanced Strategy Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Balanced Strategy and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Balanced Strategy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Balanced Strategy has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Balanced Strategy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Balanced Strategy

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the Balanced Strategy. In addition to that, GM is 8.71 times more volatile than Balanced Strategy Fund. It trades about -0.11 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Balanced Strategy Fund is currently generating about 0.23 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,083  in Balanced Strategy Fund on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  15.00  from holding Balanced Strategy Fund or generate 1.39% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Balanced Strategy Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Balanced Strategy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Balanced Strategy Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Balanced Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

GM and Balanced Strategy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Balanced Strategy

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Balanced Strategy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Balanced Strategy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Balanced Strategy will offset losses from the drop in Balanced Strategy's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Balanced Strategy Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges