Correlation Between GM and Energy Services

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Energy Services at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Energy Services into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Energy Services Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Energy Services and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Energy Services. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Energy Services.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Energy Services

0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Energy is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Energy Services Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Energy Services and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Energy Services. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Energy Services has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Energy Services go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Energy Services

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 1.19 times more return on investment than Energy Services. However, GM is 1.19 times more volatile than Energy Services Fund. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Energy Services Fund is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,646  in General Motors on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  772.00  from holding General Motors or generate 16.62% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy99.21%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Energy Services Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Energy Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Energy Services Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Energy Services is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

GM and Energy Services Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Energy Services

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Energy Services positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Energy Services can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energy Services will offset losses from the drop in Energy Services' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Energy Services Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like