Correlation Between GM and ESSEX
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and ESSEX PORTFOLIO L, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and ESSEX and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of ESSEX. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and ESSEX.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and ESSEX
Significant diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and ESSEX is 0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and ESSEX PORTFOLIO L in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ESSEX PORTFOLIO L and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with ESSEX. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ESSEX PORTFOLIO L has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and ESSEX go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and ESSEX
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 11.94 times more return on investment than ESSEX. However, GM is 11.94 times more volatile than ESSEX PORTFOLIO L. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ESSEX PORTFOLIO L is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest 4,536 in General Motors on September 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 645.00 from holding General Motors or generate 14.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 89.6% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. ESSEX PORTFOLIO L
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
ESSEX PORTFOLIO L |
GM and ESSEX Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and ESSEX
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and ESSEX positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, ESSEX can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ESSEX will offset losses from the drop in ESSEX's long position.The idea behind General Motors and ESSEX PORTFOLIO L pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.
Other Complementary Tools
Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios |