Correlation Between Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities and BlackRock Science Tech, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Strategic with a short position of BlackRock Science. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science

0.9
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and BlackRock is 0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Strategic Opportuni and BlackRock Science Tech in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on BlackRock Science Tech and Guggenheim Strategic is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities are associated (or correlated) with BlackRock Science. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of BlackRock Science Tech has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Strategic i.e., Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Guggenheim Strategic is expected to generate 1.76 times less return on investment than BlackRock Science. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities is 2.01 times less risky than BlackRock Science. It trades about 0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. BlackRock Science Tech is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,328  in BlackRock Science Tech on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  390.00  from holding BlackRock Science Tech or generate 11.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guggenheim Strategic Opportuni  vs.  BlackRock Science Tech

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guggenheim Strategic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly inconsistent basic indicators, Guggenheim Strategic may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
BlackRock Science Tech 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in BlackRock Science Tech are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, BlackRock Science may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Strategic and BlackRock Science positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Strategic position performs unexpectedly, BlackRock Science can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in BlackRock Science will offset losses from the drop in BlackRock Science's long position.
The idea behind Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities and BlackRock Science Tech pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm