Correlation Between Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural Mortgage, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Granite Construction with a short position of Federal Agricultural. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural.
Diversification Opportunities for Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural
0.95 | Correlation Coefficient |
Almost no diversification
The 3 months correlation between Granite and Federal is 0.95. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural Mortgage in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Federal Agricultural and Granite Construction is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Granite Construction are associated (or correlated) with Federal Agricultural. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Federal Agricultural has no effect on the direction of Granite Construction i.e., Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Granite Construction is expected to generate 0.98 times more return on investment than Federal Agricultural. However, Granite Construction is 1.02 times less risky than Federal Agricultural. It trades about 0.28 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Federal Agricultural Mortgage is currently generating about 0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest 6,488 in Granite Construction on September 10, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2,712 from holding Granite Construction or generate 41.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Granite Construction vs. Federal Agricultural Mortgage
Performance |
Timeline |
Granite Construction |
Federal Agricultural |
Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural
The main advantage of trading using opposite Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Granite Construction position performs unexpectedly, Federal Agricultural can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Federal Agricultural will offset losses from the drop in Federal Agricultural's long position.Granite Construction vs. Strategic Education | Granite Construction vs. AOI Electronics Co | Granite Construction vs. Benchmark Electronics | Granite Construction vs. G8 EDUCATION |
Federal Agricultural vs. UNITED RENTALS | Federal Agricultural vs. Chuangs China Investments | Federal Agricultural vs. REINET INVESTMENTS SCA | Federal Agricultural vs. Scandinavian Tobacco Group |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.
Other Complementary Tools
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |