Correlation Between Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural Mortgage, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Granite Construction with a short position of Federal Agricultural. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural.

Diversification Opportunities for Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural

0.94
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Granite and Federal is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural Mortgage in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Federal Agricultural and Granite Construction is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Granite Construction are associated (or correlated) with Federal Agricultural. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Federal Agricultural has no effect on the direction of Granite Construction i.e., Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Granite Construction is expected to generate 0.97 times more return on investment than Federal Agricultural. However, Granite Construction is 1.03 times less risky than Federal Agricultural. It trades about 0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Federal Agricultural Mortgage is currently generating about 0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,388  in Granite Construction on September 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,062  from holding Granite Construction or generate 47.93% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Granite Construction  vs.  Federal Agricultural Mortgage

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Granite Construction 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

25 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Granite Construction are ranked lower than 25 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Granite Construction unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Federal Agricultural 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Federal Agricultural Mortgage are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, Federal Agricultural reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural

The main advantage of trading using opposite Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Granite Construction position performs unexpectedly, Federal Agricultural can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Federal Agricultural will offset losses from the drop in Federal Agricultural's long position.
The idea behind Granite Construction and Federal Agricultural Mortgage pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance