Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Income and Hunter Small Cap, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Hunter Small. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small

0.7

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Hunter Small

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Hunter is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Income and Hunter Small Cap in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hunter Small Cap and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Income are associated (or correlated) with Hunter Small. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hunter Small Cap has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Income is expected to under-perform the Hunter Small. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Income is 3.13 times less risky than Hunter Small. The mutual fund trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Hunter Small Cap is currently generating about -0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,269  in Hunter Small Cap on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (21.00) from holding Hunter Small Cap or give up 1.65% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Income  vs.  Hunter Small Cap

Goldman Sachs Income

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Income has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Hunter Small Cap

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Hunter Small Cap has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Hunter Small is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Hunter Small positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Hunter Small can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hunter Small will offset losses from the drop in Hunter Small's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Income and Hunter Small Cap pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.