Correlation Between Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lafargeholcim Ltd ADR and Martin Marietta Materials, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lafargeholcim with a short position of Martin Marietta. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta.

Diversification Opportunities for Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Lafargeholcim and Martin is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lafargeholcim Ltd ADR and Martin Marietta Materials in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Martin Marietta Materials and Lafargeholcim is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lafargeholcim Ltd ADR are associated (or correlated) with Martin Marietta. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Martin Marietta Materials has no effect on the direction of Lafargeholcim i.e., Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta

Assuming the 90 days horizon Lafargeholcim is expected to generate 2.32 times less return on investment than Martin Marietta. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Lafargeholcim Ltd ADR is 1.3 times less risky than Martin Marietta. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Martin Marietta Materials is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  51,945  in Martin Marietta Materials on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,615  from holding Martin Marietta Materials or generate 14.66% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Lafargeholcim Ltd ADR  vs.  Martin Marietta Materials

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Lafargeholcim ADR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lafargeholcim Ltd ADR are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Lafargeholcim is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Martin Marietta Materials 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Martin Marietta Materials are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very inconsistent essential indicators, Martin Marietta displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta

The main advantage of trading using opposite Lafargeholcim and Martin Marietta positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lafargeholcim position performs unexpectedly, Martin Marietta can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Martin Marietta will offset losses from the drop in Martin Marietta's long position.
The idea behind Lafargeholcim Ltd ADR and Martin Marietta Materials pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios