Correlation Between Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hilton Worldwide Holdings and Columbus McKinnon, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hilton Worldwide with a short position of Columbus McKinnon. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon.

Diversification Opportunities for Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon

0.89

Correlation Coefficient

Hilton Worldwide  Columbus McKinnon

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hilton and Columbus is 0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hilton Worldwide Holdings and Columbus McKinnon in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbus McKinnon and Hilton Worldwide is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hilton Worldwide Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Columbus McKinnon. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbus McKinnon has no effect on the direction of Hilton Worldwide i.e., Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Hilton Worldwide is expected to generate 2.29 times less return on investment than Columbus McKinnon. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 1.57 times less risky than Columbus McKinnon. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbus McKinnon is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,732  in Columbus McKinnon on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  235.50  from holding Columbus McKinnon or generate 6.31% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	95.45%
Values	Daily Returns

Hilton Worldwide Holdings  vs.  Columbus McKinnon

Hilton Worldwide Holdings

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hilton Worldwide Holdings are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak essential indicators, Hilton Worldwide unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Columbus McKinnon

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbus McKinnon are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very uncertain fundamental indicators, Columbus McKinnon displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hilton Worldwide and Columbus McKinnon positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hilton Worldwide position performs unexpectedly, Columbus McKinnon can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbus McKinnon will offset losses from the drop in Columbus McKinnon's long position.

The idea behind Hilton Worldwide Holdings and Columbus McKinnon pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.