Correlation Between Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Iron Mountain Incorporated and Hannon Armstrong Sustainable, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Iron Mountain with a short position of Hannon Armstrong. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong.

Diversification Opportunities for Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong

0.4

Correlation Coefficient

Iron Mountain  Hannon Armstrong

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Iron and Hannon is 0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Iron Mountain Incorporated and Hannon Armstrong Sustainable in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hannon Armstrong Sus and Iron Mountain is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Iron Mountain Incorporated are associated (or correlated) with Hannon Armstrong. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hannon Armstrong Sus has no effect on the direction of Iron Mountain i.e., Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Iron Mountain Incorporated is expected to generate 0.7 times more return on investment than Hannon Armstrong. However, Iron Mountain Incorporated is 1.42 times less risky than Hannon Armstrong. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Hannon Armstrong Sustainable is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,257  in Iron Mountain Incorporated on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,167  from holding Iron Mountain Incorporated or generate 10.37% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Iron Mountain Incorporated  vs.  Hannon Armstrong Sustainable

Iron Mountain

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Iron Mountain Incorporated are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Iron Mountain may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Hannon Armstrong Sus

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Hannon Armstrong Sustainable has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fairly strong basic indicators, Hannon Armstrong is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Pair Trading with Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong

The main advantage of trading using opposite Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Iron Mountain position performs unexpectedly, Hannon Armstrong can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hannon Armstrong will offset losses from the drop in Hannon Armstrong's long position.

The idea behind Iron Mountain Incorporated and Hannon Armstrong Sustainable pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.