Correlation Between Jones Lang and Re Max

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Jones Lang and Re Max at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Jones Lang and Re Max into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Jones Lang LaSalle and Re Max Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Jones Lang and Re Max and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Jones Lang with a short position of Re Max. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Jones Lang and Re Max.

Diversification Opportunities for Jones Lang and Re Max

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Jones and RMAX is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Jones Lang LaSalle and Re Max Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Re Max Holding and Jones Lang is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Jones Lang LaSalle are associated (or correlated) with Re Max. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Re Max Holding has no effect on the direction of Jones Lang i.e., Jones Lang and Re Max go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Jones Lang and Re Max

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Jones Lang is expected to generate 1.63 times less return on investment than Re Max. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Jones Lang LaSalle is 1.96 times less risky than Re Max. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Re Max Holding is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,124  in Re Max Holding on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  192.00  from holding Re Max Holding or generate 17.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Jones Lang LaSalle  vs.  Re Max Holding

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Jones Lang LaSalle 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Jones Lang LaSalle are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite conflicting essential indicators, Jones Lang may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Re Max Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Re Max Holding are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly inconsistent basic indicators, Re Max showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Jones Lang and Re Max Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Jones Lang and Re Max

The main advantage of trading using opposite Jones Lang and Re Max positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Jones Lang position performs unexpectedly, Re Max can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Re Max will offset losses from the drop in Re Max's long position.
The idea behind Jones Lang LaSalle and Re Max Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals