Correlation Between Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Johnson Johnson with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble

0.29

Correlation Coefficient

Johnson Johnson  Procter Gamble

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Johnson and Procter is 0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Johnson Johnson is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Johnson Johnson are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Johnson Johnson i.e., Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Johnson Johnson is expected to under-perform the Procter Gamble. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Johnson Johnson is 1.23 times less risky than Procter Gamble. The stock trades about -0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  17,350  in Procter Gamble on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  576.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 3.32% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Johnson Johnson  vs.  Procter Gamble

Johnson Johnson

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Johnson Johnson has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with latest conflicting performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain steady and the new chaos on Wall Street may also be a sign of medium-term gains for the company stakeholders.

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Johnson Johnson position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind Johnson Johnson and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.