Correlation Between John Hancock and Loomis Sayles

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both John Hancock and Loomis Sayles at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining John Hancock and Loomis Sayles into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between John Hancock Disciplined and Loomis Sayles Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on John Hancock and Loomis Sayles and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in John Hancock with a short position of Loomis Sayles. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of John Hancock and Loomis Sayles.

Diversification Opportunities for John Hancock and Loomis Sayles

0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between John and Loomis is 0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding John Hancock Disciplined and Loomis Sayles Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Loomis Sayles Growth and John Hancock is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on John Hancock Disciplined are associated (or correlated) with Loomis Sayles. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Loomis Sayles Growth has no effect on the direction of John Hancock i.e., John Hancock and Loomis Sayles go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between John Hancock and Loomis Sayles

Assuming the 90 days horizon John Hancock Disciplined is expected to under-perform the Loomis Sayles. In addition to that, John Hancock is 1.12 times more volatile than Loomis Sayles Growth. It trades about -0.36 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Loomis Sayles Growth is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,111  in Loomis Sayles Growth on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (83.00) from holding Loomis Sayles Growth or give up 2.67% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

John Hancock Disciplined  vs.  Loomis Sayles Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
John Hancock Disciplined 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days John Hancock Disciplined has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's forward indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Loomis Sayles Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Loomis Sayles Growth are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Loomis Sayles is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

John Hancock and Loomis Sayles Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with John Hancock and Loomis Sayles

The main advantage of trading using opposite John Hancock and Loomis Sayles positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if John Hancock position performs unexpectedly, Loomis Sayles can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Loomis Sayles will offset losses from the drop in Loomis Sayles' long position.
The idea behind John Hancock Disciplined and Loomis Sayles Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets