Correlation Between Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kimberly Clark de Mexico and Reckitt Benckiser Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kimberly Clark with a short position of Reckitt Benckiser. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser.

Diversification Opportunities for Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser

-0.22

Correlation Coefficient

Kimberly Clark  Reckitt Benckiser

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Kimberly and Reckitt is -0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kimberly Clark de Mexico and Reckitt Benckiser Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Reckitt Benckiser and Kimberly Clark is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kimberly Clark de Mexico are associated (or correlated) with Reckitt Benckiser. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Reckitt Benckiser has no effect on the direction of Kimberly Clark i.e., Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser

Assuming the 90 days horizon Kimberly Clark de Mexico is expected to under-perform the Reckitt Benckiser. In addition to that, Kimberly Clark is 1.1 times more volatile than Reckitt Benckiser Group. It trades about -0.11 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Reckitt Benckiser Group is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,219  in Reckitt Benckiser Group on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  14.00  from holding Reckitt Benckiser Group or generate 1.15% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Kimberly Clark de Mexico  vs.  Reckitt Benckiser Group

Kimberly Clark de

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Kimberly Clark de Mexico has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unsteady performance, the Stock's primary indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.

Reckitt Benckiser

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Reckitt Benckiser Group are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Reckitt Benckiser is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser

The main advantage of trading using opposite Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kimberly Clark position performs unexpectedly, Reckitt Benckiser can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Reckitt Benckiser will offset losses from the drop in Reckitt Benckiser's long position.

The idea behind Kimberly Clark de Mexico and Reckitt Benckiser Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.