Correlation Between Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Karolinska Development AB and Clinical Laserthermia Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Karolinska Development with a short position of Clinical Laserthermia. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia.
Diversification Opportunities for Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia
0.66 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Karolinska and Clinical is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Karolinska Development AB and Clinical Laserthermia Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Clinical Laserthermia and Karolinska Development is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Karolinska Development AB are associated (or correlated) with Clinical Laserthermia. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Clinical Laserthermia has no effect on the direction of Karolinska Development i.e., Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Karolinska Development AB is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than Clinical Laserthermia. However, Karolinska Development AB is 1.9 times less risky than Clinical Laserthermia. It trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Clinical Laserthermia Systems is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest 125.00 in Karolinska Development AB on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (19.00) from holding Karolinska Development AB or give up 15.2% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Karolinska Development AB vs. Clinical Laserthermia Systems
Performance |
Timeline |
Karolinska Development |
Clinical Laserthermia |
Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia
The main advantage of trading using opposite Karolinska Development and Clinical Laserthermia positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Karolinska Development position performs unexpectedly, Clinical Laserthermia can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Clinical Laserthermia will offset losses from the drop in Clinical Laserthermia's long position.Karolinska Development vs. Oncopeptides AB | Karolinska Development vs. Cantargia AB | Karolinska Development vs. BioInvent International AB | Karolinska Development vs. Moberg Pharma AB |
Clinical Laserthermia vs. Cantargia AB | Clinical Laserthermia vs. Episurf Medical AB | Clinical Laserthermia vs. Karolinska Development AB | Clinical Laserthermia vs. Acarix AS |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets |