Correlation Between LAMB and PURA
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both LAMB and PURA at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining LAMB and PURA into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between LAMB and PURA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on LAMB and PURA and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in LAMB with a short position of PURA. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of LAMB and PURA.
Diversification Opportunities for LAMB and PURA
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between LAMB and PURA is -0.57. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding LAMB and PURA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PURA and LAMB is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on LAMB are associated (or correlated) with PURA. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PURA has no effect on the direction of LAMB i.e., LAMB and PURA go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between LAMB and PURA
If you would invest 0.19 in LAMB on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 0.02 from holding LAMB or generate 11.05% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 1.56% |
Values | Daily Returns |
LAMB vs. PURA
Performance |
Timeline |
LAMB |
PURA |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
LAMB and PURA Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with LAMB and PURA
The main advantage of trading using opposite LAMB and PURA positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if LAMB position performs unexpectedly, PURA can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PURA will offset losses from the drop in PURA's long position.The idea behind LAMB and PURA pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.
Other Complementary Tools
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets |