Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Medical Properties

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Medical Properties at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Medical Properties into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Medical Properties Trust, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Medical Properties and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Medical Properties. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Medical Properties.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Medical Properties

-0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Medical is -0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Medical Properties Trust in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Medical Properties Trust and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Medical Properties. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Medical Properties Trust has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Medical Properties go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Medical Properties

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 0.97 times more return on investment than Medical Properties. However, Litigation Capital Management is 1.03 times less risky than Medical Properties. It trades about -0.27 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Medical Properties Trust is currently generating about -0.32 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,575  in Litigation Capital Management on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,325) from holding Litigation Capital Management or give up 11.45% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Medical Properties Trust

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Medical Properties Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Medical Properties Trust has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Litigation Capital and Medical Properties Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Medical Properties

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Medical Properties positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Medical Properties can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Medical Properties will offset losses from the drop in Medical Properties' long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Medical Properties Trust pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas