Correlation Between Matthews China and World Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Matthews China and World Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Matthews China and World Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Matthews China Fund and World Energy Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Matthews China and World Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Matthews China with a short position of World Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Matthews China and World Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Matthews China and World Energy

-0.02

Correlation Coefficient

Matthews China  World Energy

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Matthews and World is -0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Matthews China Fund and World Energy Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on World Energy and Matthews China is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Matthews China Fund are associated (or correlated) with World Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of World Energy has no effect on the direction of Matthews China i.e., Matthews China and World Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Matthews China and World Energy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Matthews China Fund is expected to generate 2.53 times more return on investment than World Energy. However, Matthews China is 2.53 times more volatile than World Energy Fund. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. World Energy Fund is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,271  in Matthews China Fund on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  83.00  from holding Matthews China Fund or generate 6.53% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Matthews China Fund  vs.  World Energy Fund

Matthews China

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Matthews China Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Matthews China may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

World Energy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in World Energy Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, World Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Matthews China and World Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Matthews China and World Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Matthews China position performs unexpectedly, World Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in World Energy will offset losses from the drop in World Energy's long position.

The idea behind Matthews China Fund and World Energy Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.