Correlation Between Matthews China and Cargile Fund

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Matthews China and Cargile Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Matthews China and Cargile Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Matthews China Fund and Cargile Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Matthews China and Cargile Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Matthews China with a short position of Cargile Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Matthews China and Cargile Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Matthews China and Cargile Fund

-0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Matthews and Cargile is -0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Matthews China Fund and Cargile Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cargile Fund and Matthews China is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Matthews China Fund are associated (or correlated) with Cargile Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cargile Fund has no effect on the direction of Matthews China i.e., Matthews China and Cargile Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Matthews China and Cargile Fund

Assuming the 90 days horizon Matthews China Fund is expected to generate 9.25 times more return on investment than Cargile Fund. However, Matthews China is 9.25 times more volatile than Cargile Fund. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cargile Fund is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,271  in Matthews China Fund on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  83.00  from holding Matthews China Fund or generate 6.53% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Matthews China Fund  vs.  Cargile Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Matthews China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Matthews China Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Matthews China may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Cargile Fund 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cargile Fund are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Cargile Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Matthews China and Cargile Fund Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Matthews China and Cargile Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Matthews China and Cargile Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Matthews China position performs unexpectedly, Cargile Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cargile Fund will offset losses from the drop in Cargile Fund's long position.
The idea behind Matthews China Fund and Cargile Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets