Correlation Between Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs International Diversification and Jpmorgan Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs International with a short position of Jpmorgan Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging

0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Jpmorgan is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs International Diversificat and Jpmorgan Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Jpmorgan Emerging Markets and Mfs International is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs International Diversification are associated (or correlated) with Jpmorgan Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Jpmorgan Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Mfs International i.e., Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs International Diversification is expected to under-perform the Jpmorgan Emerging. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Mfs International Diversification is 1.22 times less risky than Jpmorgan Emerging. The mutual fund trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Jpmorgan Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,094  in Jpmorgan Emerging Markets on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  82.00  from holding Jpmorgan Emerging Markets or generate 2.65% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs International Diversificat  vs.  Jpmorgan Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mfs International Diversification has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Mfs International is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Jpmorgan Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Jpmorgan Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Jpmorgan Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs International and Jpmorgan Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs International position performs unexpectedly, Jpmorgan Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Jpmorgan Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Jpmorgan Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Mfs International Diversification and Jpmorgan Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.