Correlation Between Maple Leaf and Salesforce

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Maple Leaf and Salesforce at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Maple Leaf and Salesforce into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Maple Leaf Foods and SalesforceCom CDR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Maple Leaf and Salesforce and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Maple Leaf with a short position of Salesforce. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Maple Leaf and Salesforce.

Diversification Opportunities for Maple Leaf and Salesforce

0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Maple and Salesforce is 0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Maple Leaf Foods and SalesforceCom CDR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SalesforceCom CDR and Maple Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Maple Leaf Foods are associated (or correlated) with Salesforce. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SalesforceCom CDR has no effect on the direction of Maple Leaf i.e., Maple Leaf and Salesforce go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Maple Leaf and Salesforce

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Maple Leaf is expected to generate 6.48 times less return on investment than Salesforce. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Maple Leaf Foods is 1.14 times less risky than Salesforce. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. SalesforceCom CDR is currently generating about 0.26 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,981  in SalesforceCom CDR on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  650.00  from holding SalesforceCom CDR or generate 32.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Maple Leaf Foods  vs.  SalesforceCom CDR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
SalesforceCom CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in SalesforceCom CDR are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very fragile basic indicators, Salesforce displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Maple Leaf and Salesforce Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Maple Leaf and Salesforce

The main advantage of trading using opposite Maple Leaf and Salesforce positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, Salesforce can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Salesforce will offset losses from the drop in Salesforce's long position.
The idea behind Maple Leaf Foods and SalesforceCom CDR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets