Correlation Between Marks and Oxford Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Marks and Oxford Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Marks and Oxford Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Marks and Spencer and Oxford Technology 2, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Marks and Oxford Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Marks with a short position of Oxford Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Marks and Oxford Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for Marks and Oxford Technology

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Marks and Oxford is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Marks and Spencer and Oxford Technology 2 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oxford Technology and Marks is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Marks and Spencer are associated (or correlated) with Oxford Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oxford Technology has no effect on the direction of Marks i.e., Marks and Oxford Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Marks and Oxford Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Marks and Spencer is expected to generate 0.58 times more return on investment than Oxford Technology. However, Marks and Spencer is 1.71 times less risky than Oxford Technology. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Oxford Technology 2 is currently generating about -0.23 per unit of risk. If you would invest  37,502  in Marks and Spencer on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  438.00  from holding Marks and Spencer or generate 1.17% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.48%
ValuesDaily Returns

Marks and Spencer  vs.  Oxford Technology 2

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Marks and Spencer 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Marks and Spencer are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Marks is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Oxford Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Oxford Technology 2 has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

Marks and Oxford Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Marks and Oxford Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite Marks and Oxford Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Marks position performs unexpectedly, Oxford Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oxford Technology will offset losses from the drop in Oxford Technology's long position.
The idea behind Marks and Spencer and Oxford Technology 2 pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes