Correlation Between Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ming Le Sports and Columbia Sportswear, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ming Le with a short position of Columbia Sportswear. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear.

Diversification Opportunities for Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ming and Columbia is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ming Le Sports and Columbia Sportswear in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Sportswear and Ming Le is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ming Le Sports are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Sportswear. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Sportswear has no effect on the direction of Ming Le i.e., Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ming Le Sports is expected to generate 2.47 times more return on investment than Columbia Sportswear. However, Ming Le is 2.47 times more volatile than Columbia Sportswear. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Sportswear is currently generating about 0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  109.00  in Ming Le Sports on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  30.00  from holding Ming Le Sports or generate 27.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ming Le Sports  vs.  Columbia Sportswear

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ming Le Sports 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ming Le Sports are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Ming Le unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Columbia Sportswear 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Sportswear are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Columbia Sportswear reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ming Le and Columbia Sportswear positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ming Le position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Sportswear can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Sportswear will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Sportswear's long position.
The idea behind Ming Le Sports and Columbia Sportswear pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world