Correlation Between Monster Beverage and Dine Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Monster Beverage and Dine Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Monster Beverage and Dine Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Monster Beverage Corp and Dine Brands Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Monster Beverage and Dine Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Monster Beverage with a short position of Dine Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Monster Beverage and Dine Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Monster Beverage and Dine Brands

0.58
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Monster and Dine is 0.58. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Monster Beverage Corp and Dine Brands Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dine Brands Global and Monster Beverage is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Monster Beverage Corp are associated (or correlated) with Dine Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dine Brands Global has no effect on the direction of Monster Beverage i.e., Monster Beverage and Dine Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Monster Beverage and Dine Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Monster Beverage Corp is expected to generate 0.44 times more return on investment than Dine Brands. However, Monster Beverage Corp is 2.28 times less risky than Dine Brands. It trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Dine Brands Global is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,370  in Monster Beverage Corp on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (198.00) from holding Monster Beverage Corp or give up 3.69% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Monster Beverage Corp  vs.  Dine Brands Global

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Monster Beverage Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Monster Beverage Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Monster Beverage is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dine Brands Global are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Dine Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Monster Beverage and Dine Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Monster Beverage and Dine Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Monster Beverage and Dine Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Monster Beverage position performs unexpectedly, Dine Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will offset losses from the drop in Dine Brands' long position.
The idea behind Monster Beverage Corp and Dine Brands Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance