Correlation Between Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Morgan Stanley Direct and Lem Holding SA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Morgan Stanley with a short position of Lem Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding

-0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Morgan and Lem is -0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Morgan Stanley Direct and Lem Holding SA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Lem Holding SA and Morgan Stanley is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Morgan Stanley Direct are associated (or correlated) with Lem Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Lem Holding SA has no effect on the direction of Morgan Stanley i.e., Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Morgan Stanley Direct is expected to generate 0.63 times more return on investment than Lem Holding. However, Morgan Stanley Direct is 1.59 times less risky than Lem Holding. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Lem Holding SA is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,907  in Morgan Stanley Direct on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  178.00  from holding Morgan Stanley Direct or generate 9.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy78.69%
ValuesDaily Returns

Morgan Stanley Direct  vs.  Lem Holding SA

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Morgan Stanley Direct 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Morgan Stanley Direct are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite weak fundamental indicators, Morgan Stanley may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Lem Holding SA 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Lem Holding SA has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.

Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite Morgan Stanley and Lem Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Morgan Stanley position performs unexpectedly, Lem Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Lem Holding will offset losses from the drop in Lem Holding's long position.
The idea behind Morgan Stanley Direct and Lem Holding SA pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing