Correlation Between Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Morgan Stanley Direct and Quality Hospitality Leasehold, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Morgan Stanley with a short position of Quality Hospitality. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality.

Diversification Opportunities for Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality

0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Morgan and Quality is 0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Morgan Stanley Direct and Quality Hospitality Leasehold in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Quality Hospitality and Morgan Stanley is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Morgan Stanley Direct are associated (or correlated) with Quality Hospitality. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Quality Hospitality has no effect on the direction of Morgan Stanley i.e., Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Morgan Stanley Direct is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than Quality Hospitality. However, Morgan Stanley Direct is 1.87 times less risky than Quality Hospitality. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Quality Hospitality Leasehold is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,951  in Morgan Stanley Direct on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  188.00  from holding Morgan Stanley Direct or generate 9.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Morgan Stanley Direct  vs.  Quality Hospitality Leasehold

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Morgan Stanley Direct 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Morgan Stanley Direct are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite weak fundamental indicators, Morgan Stanley may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Quality Hospitality 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Quality Hospitality Leasehold are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite conflicting forward-looking signals, Quality Hospitality may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality

The main advantage of trading using opposite Morgan Stanley and Quality Hospitality positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Morgan Stanley position performs unexpectedly, Quality Hospitality can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Quality Hospitality will offset losses from the drop in Quality Hospitality's long position.
The idea behind Morgan Stanley Direct and Quality Hospitality Leasehold pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance