Correlation Between Microsoft and Columbia Emerging

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Columbia Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Columbia Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Columbia Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Columbia Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Columbia Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Columbia Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Columbia Emerging

-0.21

Correlation Coefficient

Microsoft  Columbia Emerging

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Columbia is -0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Columbia Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Emerging Markets and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Columbia Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Columbia Emerging

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 1.41 times more return on investment than Columbia Emerging. However, Microsoft is 1.41 times more volatile than Columbia Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Emerging Markets is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  42,944  in Microsoft on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  867.00  from holding Microsoft or generate 2.02% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Columbia Emerging Markets

Microsoft

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Columbia Emerging Markets

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Columbia Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Columbia Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Columbia Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Columbia Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Emerging's long position.

The idea behind Microsoft and Columbia Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.