Correlation Between Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Technology Fund and Dunham Porategovernment Bond, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Technology with a short position of Dunham Porategovernment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment

0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Dunham is 0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Technology Fund and Dunham Porategovernment Bond in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dunham Porategovernment and Mfs Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Technology Fund are associated (or correlated) with Dunham Porategovernment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dunham Porategovernment has no effect on the direction of Mfs Technology i.e., Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Technology Fund is expected to under-perform the Dunham Porategovernment. In addition to that, Mfs Technology is 7.8 times more volatile than Dunham Porategovernment Bond. It trades about -0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Dunham Porategovernment Bond is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,217  in Dunham Porategovernment Bond on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  22.00  from holding Dunham Porategovernment Bond or generate 1.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Technology Fund  vs.  Dunham Porategovernment Bond

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mfs Technology Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's fundamental indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Dunham Porategovernment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Dunham Porategovernment Bond has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Dunham Porategovernment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Technology and Dunham Porategovernment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Technology position performs unexpectedly, Dunham Porategovernment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dunham Porategovernment will offset losses from the drop in Dunham Porategovernment's long position.
The idea behind Mfs Technology Fund and Dunham Porategovernment Bond pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope