Correlation Between Great West and John Hancock

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Great West and John Hancock at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Great West and John Hancock into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Great West Loomis Sayles and John Hancock Ii, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Great West and John Hancock and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Great West with a short position of John Hancock. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Great West and John Hancock.

Diversification Opportunities for Great West and John Hancock

0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Great and John is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Great West Loomis Sayles and John Hancock Ii in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on John Hancock Ii and Great West is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Great West Loomis Sayles are associated (or correlated) with John Hancock. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of John Hancock Ii has no effect on the direction of Great West i.e., Great West and John Hancock go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Great West and John Hancock

Assuming the 90 days horizon Great West Loomis Sayles is expected to generate 0.57 times more return on investment than John Hancock. However, Great West Loomis Sayles is 1.76 times less risky than John Hancock. It trades about -0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. John Hancock Ii is currently generating about -0.43 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,178  in Great West Loomis Sayles on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (264.00) from holding Great West Loomis Sayles or give up 6.32% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Great West Loomis Sayles  vs.  John Hancock Ii

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Great West Loomis 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Great West Loomis Sayles are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Great West is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
John Hancock Ii 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days John Hancock Ii has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Great West and John Hancock Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Great West and John Hancock

The main advantage of trading using opposite Great West and John Hancock positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Great West position performs unexpectedly, John Hancock can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in John Hancock will offset losses from the drop in John Hancock's long position.
The idea behind Great West Loomis Sayles and John Hancock Ii pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk