Correlation Between Nissan and Fisker
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Nissan and Fisker at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Nissan and Fisker into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Nissan Motor Co and Fisker Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Nissan and Fisker and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Nissan with a short position of Fisker. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Nissan and Fisker.
Diversification Opportunities for Nissan and Fisker
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Nissan and Fisker is 0.35. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Nissan Motor Co and Fisker Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fisker Inc and Nissan is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Nissan Motor Co are associated (or correlated) with Fisker. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fisker Inc has no effect on the direction of Nissan i.e., Nissan and Fisker go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Nissan and Fisker
If you would invest 615.00 in Fisker Inc on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Fisker Inc or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Nissan Motor Co vs. Fisker Inc
Performance |
Timeline |
Nissan Motor |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Fisker Inc |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Nissan and Fisker Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Nissan and Fisker
The main advantage of trading using opposite Nissan and Fisker positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Nissan position performs unexpectedly, Fisker can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fisker will offset losses from the drop in Fisker's long position.Nissan vs. Honda Motor Co | Nissan vs. Toyota Motor | Nissan vs. Hyundai Motor Co | Nissan vs. Bayerische Motoren Werke |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.
Other Complementary Tools
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |