Correlation Between NYSE Composite and Safety Shot

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both NYSE Composite and Safety Shot at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining NYSE Composite and Safety Shot into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between NYSE Composite and Safety Shot, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on NYSE Composite and Safety Shot and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in NYSE Composite with a short position of Safety Shot. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of NYSE Composite and Safety Shot.

Diversification Opportunities for NYSE Composite and Safety Shot

-0.41

Correlation Coefficient

NYSE Composite  Safety Shot

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between NYSE and Safety is -0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding NYSE Composite and Safety Shot in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Safety Shot and NYSE Composite is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on NYSE Composite are associated (or correlated) with Safety Shot. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Safety Shot has no effect on the direction of NYSE Composite i.e., NYSE Composite and Safety Shot go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between NYSE Composite and Safety Shot

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon NYSE Composite is expected to under-perform the Safety Shot. But the index apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, NYSE Composite is 29.18 times less risky than Safety Shot. The index trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Safety Shot is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  28.00  in Safety Shot on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (10.00) from holding Safety Shot or give up 35.71% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	90.63%
Values	Daily Returns

NYSE Composite  vs.  Safety Shot

Pair Trading with NYSE Composite and Safety Shot

The main advantage of trading using opposite NYSE Composite and Safety Shot positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if NYSE Composite position performs unexpectedly, Safety Shot can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Safety Shot will offset losses from the drop in Safety Shot's long position.

The idea behind NYSE Composite and Safety Shot pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.