Correlation Between Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cogent Communications Holdings and PennantPark Investment, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cogent Communications with a short position of PennantPark Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment.
Diversification Opportunities for Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment
0.63 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Cogent and PennantPark is 0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cogent Communications Holdings and PennantPark Investment in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PennantPark Investment and Cogent Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cogent Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with PennantPark Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PennantPark Investment has no effect on the direction of Cogent Communications i.e., Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Cogent Communications Holdings is expected to generate 1.07 times more return on investment than PennantPark Investment. However, Cogent Communications is 1.07 times more volatile than PennantPark Investment. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. PennantPark Investment is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest 6,517 in Cogent Communications Holdings on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 783.00 from holding Cogent Communications Holdings or generate 12.01% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Cogent Communications Holdings vs. PennantPark Investment
Performance |
Timeline |
Cogent Communications |
PennantPark Investment |
Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment
The main advantage of trading using opposite Cogent Communications and PennantPark Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cogent Communications position performs unexpectedly, PennantPark Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PennantPark Investment will offset losses from the drop in PennantPark Investment's long position.Cogent Communications vs. T Mobile | Cogent Communications vs. China Mobile Limited | Cogent Communications vs. ATT Inc | Cogent Communications vs. ATT Inc |
PennantPark Investment vs. Blackstone Group | PennantPark Investment vs. The Bank of | PennantPark Investment vs. Ameriprise Financial | PennantPark Investment vs. State Street |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.
Other Complementary Tools
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk |