Correlation Between Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cogent Communications Holdings and METHODE ELECTRONICS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cogent Communications with a short position of METHODE ELECTRONICS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS.

Diversification Opportunities for Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS

-0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cogent and METHODE is -0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cogent Communications Holdings and METHODE ELECTRONICS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on METHODE ELECTRONICS and Cogent Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cogent Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with METHODE ELECTRONICS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of METHODE ELECTRONICS has no effect on the direction of Cogent Communications i.e., Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Cogent Communications Holdings is expected to generate 0.52 times more return on investment than METHODE ELECTRONICS. However, Cogent Communications Holdings is 1.93 times less risky than METHODE ELECTRONICS. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. METHODE ELECTRONICS is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,808  in Cogent Communications Holdings on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,492  from holding Cogent Communications Holdings or generate 51.83% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cogent Communications Holdings  vs.  METHODE ELECTRONICS

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cogent Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cogent Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile primary indicators, Cogent Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
METHODE ELECTRONICS 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in METHODE ELECTRONICS are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile basic indicators, METHODE ELECTRONICS unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cogent Communications and METHODE ELECTRONICS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cogent Communications position performs unexpectedly, METHODE ELECTRONICS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in METHODE ELECTRONICS will offset losses from the drop in METHODE ELECTRONICS's long position.
The idea behind Cogent Communications Holdings and METHODE ELECTRONICS pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments