Correlation Between OMX Copenhagen and HNX 30
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between OMX Copenhagen All and HNX 30, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on OMX Copenhagen and HNX 30 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in OMX Copenhagen with a short position of HNX 30. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of OMX Copenhagen and HNX 30.
Diversification Opportunities for OMX Copenhagen and HNX 30
0.8 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between OMX and HNX is 0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding OMX Copenhagen All and HNX 30 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on HNX 30 and OMX Copenhagen is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on OMX Copenhagen All are associated (or correlated) with HNX 30. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of HNX 30 has no effect on the direction of OMX Copenhagen i.e., OMX Copenhagen and HNX 30 go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between OMX Copenhagen and HNX 30
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon OMX Copenhagen All is expected to under-perform the HNX 30. In addition to that, OMX Copenhagen is 1.51 times more volatile than HNX 30. It trades about -0.16 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. HNX 30 is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 51,811 in HNX 30 on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3,832) from holding HNX 30 or give up 7.4% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 95.45% |
Values | Daily Returns |
OMX Copenhagen All vs. HNX 30
Performance |
Timeline |
OMX Copenhagen and HNX 30 Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
OMX Copenhagen All
Pair trading matchups for OMX Copenhagen
HNX 30
Pair trading matchups for HNX 30
Pair Trading with OMX Copenhagen and HNX 30
The main advantage of trading using opposite OMX Copenhagen and HNX 30 positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if OMX Copenhagen position performs unexpectedly, HNX 30 can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in HNX 30 will offset losses from the drop in HNX 30's long position.OMX Copenhagen vs. Lollands Bank | OMX Copenhagen vs. Scandinavian Medical Solutions | OMX Copenhagen vs. Skjern Bank AS | OMX Copenhagen vs. Danske Andelskassers Bank |
HNX 30 vs. Viet Thanh Plastic | HNX 30 vs. Picomat Plastic JSC | HNX 30 vs. Elcom Technology Communications | HNX 30 vs. Sao Vang Rubber |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.
Other Complementary Tools
Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets |