Correlation Between Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Purecycle Technologies Holdings and Atmus Filtration Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Purecycle Technologies with a short position of Atmus Filtration. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration.

Diversification Opportunities for Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Purecycle and Atmus is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Purecycle Technologies Holding and Atmus Filtration Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Atmus Filtration Tec and Purecycle Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Purecycle Technologies Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Atmus Filtration. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Atmus Filtration Tec has no effect on the direction of Purecycle Technologies i.e., Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Purecycle Technologies Holdings is expected to generate 2.78 times more return on investment than Atmus Filtration. However, Purecycle Technologies is 2.78 times more volatile than Atmus Filtration Technologies. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Atmus Filtration Technologies is currently generating about -0.27 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,160  in Purecycle Technologies Holdings on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.50) from holding Purecycle Technologies Holdings or give up 0.3% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Purecycle Technologies Holding  vs.  Atmus Filtration Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Purecycle Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Purecycle Technologies Holdings are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively abnormal fundamental indicators, Purecycle Technologies unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Atmus Filtration Tec 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Atmus Filtration Technologies are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively abnormal primary indicators, Atmus Filtration may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration

The main advantage of trading using opposite Purecycle Technologies and Atmus Filtration positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Purecycle Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Atmus Filtration can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Atmus Filtration will offset losses from the drop in Atmus Filtration's long position.
The idea behind Purecycle Technologies Holdings and Atmus Filtration Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation