Correlation Between Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Asset Management and Firsthand Alternative Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Asset with a short position of Firsthand Alternative. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative.

Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative

0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Firsthand is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Asset Management and Firsthand Alternative Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Firsthand Alternative and Strategic Asset is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Asset Management are associated (or correlated) with Firsthand Alternative. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Firsthand Alternative has no effect on the direction of Strategic Asset i.e., Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative

Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Asset Management is expected to under-perform the Firsthand Alternative. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Strategic Asset Management is 5.66 times less risky than Firsthand Alternative. The mutual fund trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Firsthand Alternative Energy is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,028  in Firsthand Alternative Energy on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.00) from holding Firsthand Alternative Energy or give up 0.29% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy84.13%
ValuesDaily Returns

Strategic Asset Management  vs.  Firsthand Alternative Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Strategic Asset Mana 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Strategic Asset Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Strategic Asset is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Firsthand Alternative 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Firsthand Alternative Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Firsthand Alternative is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative

The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Asset and Firsthand Alternative positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Asset position performs unexpectedly, Firsthand Alternative can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Firsthand Alternative will offset losses from the drop in Firsthand Alternative's long position.
The idea behind Strategic Asset Management and Firsthand Alternative Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk