Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Foods Inns

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Foods Inns at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Foods Inns into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble Health and Foods Inns Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Foods Inns and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Foods Inns. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Foods Inns.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Foods Inns

0.0

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Foods Inns

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Foods is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble Health and Foods Inns Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Foods Inns Limited and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble Health are associated (or correlated) with Foods Inns. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Foods Inns Limited has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Foods Inns go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Foods Inns

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Procter Gamble Health is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than Foods Inns. However, Procter Gamble Health is 1.9 times less risky than Foods Inns. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Foods Inns Limited is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  536,313  in Procter Gamble Health on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (7,608) from holding Procter Gamble Health or give up 1.42% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Flat
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Procter Gamble Health  vs.  Foods Inns Limited

Procter Gamble Health

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble Health has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Foods Inns Limited

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Foods Inns Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Foods Inns

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Foods Inns positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Foods Inns can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Foods Inns will offset losses from the drop in Foods Inns' long position.

The idea behind Procter Gamble Health and Foods Inns Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.