Correlation Between PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PayPal Holdings CDR and Berkshire Hathaway CDR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PayPal Holdings with a short position of Berkshire Hathaway. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway.

Diversification Opportunities for PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway

0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between PayPal and Berkshire is 0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PayPal Holdings CDR and Berkshire Hathaway CDR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Berkshire Hathaway CDR and PayPal Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PayPal Holdings CDR are associated (or correlated) with Berkshire Hathaway. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Berkshire Hathaway CDR has no effect on the direction of PayPal Holdings i.e., PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon PayPal Holdings CDR is expected to generate 1.74 times more return on investment than Berkshire Hathaway. However, PayPal Holdings is 1.74 times more volatile than Berkshire Hathaway CDR. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Berkshire Hathaway CDR is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  583.00  in PayPal Holdings CDR on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  62.00  from holding PayPal Holdings CDR or generate 10.63% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

PayPal Holdings CDR  vs.  Berkshire Hathaway CDR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
PayPal Holdings CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in PayPal Holdings CDR are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating technical and fundamental indicators, PayPal Holdings may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Berkshire Hathaway CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Berkshire Hathaway CDR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Berkshire Hathaway is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway

The main advantage of trading using opposite PayPal Holdings and Berkshire Hathaway positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PayPal Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Berkshire Hathaway can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Berkshire Hathaway will offset losses from the drop in Berkshire Hathaway's long position.
The idea behind PayPal Holdings CDR and Berkshire Hathaway CDR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope